Get a free audit

Rated 5.0 on Google

Original data, refreshed every quarter

Apartment Search Benchmark What four apartment websites earned from Google in 90 days

Across four apartment websites, 88 percent of the clicks Google Search Console reported a search for came from people who searched the community's name or its management company's name, in the 90 days to October 14, 2026. Searches for apartments in a place earned far less. The figures, the method and a way to compare your own site follow.

Get a free auditBook a free call

In short 11 min read

  • Name searches brought 88 percent of clicks with a reported search; searches that named no property were 27 percent of impressions and 12 percent of clicks.
  • Phones produced 63 percent of clicks; home and community pages took 85 percent of clicks between them.
  • The median community page on a management company website earned 2 clicks and 129 impressions in 90 days.

Key findings, October 2026

Pooled Google Search Console data for four apartment websites, July 17 to October 14, 2026. Each line stands on its own, so it can be quoted as written.

  1. Across four apartment websites, 88 percent of clicks with a reported search came from searches naming the community or its management company (Google Search Console, July 17 to October 14, 2026).

  2. On four apartment websites, searches that did not name the property were 27 percent of impressions but 12 percent of clicks, at an average position of 25.7 against 6.5 for name searches (Google Search Console, July 17 to October 14, 2026).

  3. Phones produced 63 percent of clicks and 53 percent of impressions on four apartment websites, at a 5.2 percent click-through rate against 3.4 percent on desktop (Google Search Console, July 17 to October 14, 2026).

  4. The median community page on a management company website earned 2 clicks and 129 impressions in 90 days, and 23 percent of 236 such pages earned no clicks at all (Google Search Console, July 17 to October 14, 2026).

  5. On four apartment websites, home pages took 41 percent of clicks from 16 percent of impressions, while community pages took 45 percent of clicks from 55 percent of impressions (Google Search Console, July 17 to October 14, 2026).

How many clicks does an apartment website get from Google?

Not many per page, and most of them come from people who already know the name. Pooled across the four websites in this sample, 4.4 percent of Google search impressions turned into a click, at an average position of 12.6, over 90 days. The median community page earned 2 clicks in that time.

MeasureAll four websites, 90 days

Websites

4: two single-community sites, two management company sites with a page per community

Community pages measured

236

Window

July 17 to October 14, 2026

Click-through rate, pooled

4.4%

Average position, pooled

12.6

Share of clicks Google reported a search for

60%

Impressions count how often a page appeared in search. The click-through rate, or CTR, is the share of those appearances that got a click. Average position is where the page sat on the results page, weighted by impressions, so 1 is the top.

Two sites can post almost the same totals and sit on opposite sides of it.

What does a typical community page earn?

Very little on its own. Across 236 community pages on two management company websites, the median page earned 2 clicks and 129 impressions in 90 days, and the middle half earned between 1 and 5 clicks. Almost a quarter earned none. These are the pages' own figures; they leave out any separate website a community may have.

Community pages, 90 days25th percentileMedian75th percentile

Clicks

1

2

5

Impressions

41

129

574

Click-through rate

0.2%

0.9%

3.8%

Average position

7.1

8.8

11.7

Each column is worked out on its own, so a row does not describe one page. 23 percent of the 236 pages earned no clicks in the window.

How much apartment search is branded?

Most of it. 88 percent of clicks with a reported search came from searches naming the community, its management company or someone at the company. On the median website in the sample the share was 90 percent. Name searches also ranked far higher: an average position of 6.5, against 25.7 for searches that named no property.

SearchShare of clicksShare of impressionsCTRAverage position

Names the community, its manager or someone there

88.3%

71.3%

4.1%

6.5

Does not name it

11.6%

26.8%

1.5%

25.7

A street address

0.1%

1.9%

0.2%

34.0

A branded search is one that contains the property's own name. The split matters more than any other cut, because it shows whether a site is only catching people who already know it or really reaching new renters. Two sites can post almost the same totals and sit on opposite sides of it.

When a site does rank for a unit type, the searcher is close to a decision.

Which searches reach renters who do not know the name?

Searches for apartments in or near a place lead, at 4.9 percent of clicks and 13.9 percent of impressions, but on average they sit on page three. Floor plan and unit type searches, such as studios, townhomes and bedroom counts, brought 2.5 percent of clicks, and income-restricted housing searches 1.2 percent.

Search typeShare of clicksShare of impressionsCTRAverage position

Names the community or its management company

88.3%

71.3%

4.1%

6.5

Apartments in or near a place

4.9%

13.9%

1.2%

24.6

Floor plans and unit types

2.5%

2.0%

4.2%

17.7

Income-restricted and affordable

1.2%

1.1%

3.5%

31.6

"Near me" searches

0.9%

0.5%

5.6%

12.1

Property management services

0.7%

3.2%

0.7%

19.7

A street address

0.1%

1.9%

0.2%

34.0

Amenities

under 0.1%

0.1%

under 0.1%

18.8

Pet-friendly

under 0.1%

0.1%

2.3%

17.7

Jobs and careers

under 0.1%

0.1%

0.9%

17.4

Resident tasks (portal, paying rent)

under 0.1%

under 0.1%

under 0.1%

24.5

Everything else

1.3%

5.8%

0.8%

34.8

Floor plan searches clicked through at 4.2 percent, about the same rate as name searches, from much further down the page. When a site does rank for a unit type, the searcher is close to a decision. That is the case for a page per floor plan, which our multifamily SEO page sets out.

Which pages earn the clicks?

Home pages and community pages, which took 85 percent of clicks between them. Home pages turned impressions into clicks best, at an 8.4 percent click-through rate. Neighborhood pages and blog posts drew about 5 percent of impressions together but under half a percent of clicks.

Page typeShare of clicksShare of impressionsCTRAverage position

Home page

40.9%

16.2%

8.4%

19.8

Community pages (one per community)

44.5%

54.8%

2.7%

10.2

Company, careers and owner services

5.8%

12.3%

1.6%

4.4

Availability, floor plans and directories

3.2%

5.3%

2.0%

7.7

Resident pages (portal, renewals)

3.1%

0.4%

27.0%

4.3

Contact and tour pages

1.7%

4.4%

1.3%

5.0

Gallery, amenities and program pages

0.3%

1.7%

0.6%

13.2

Neighborhood and area pages

0.2%

2.0%

0.4%

16.3

Blog posts and guides

0.2%

2.8%

0.2%

11.7

Other (legal, accessibility, archives)

under 0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

11.7

Resident pages are a small share but clicked through at 27 percent: most people who search for them already live there and want the portal.

How much apartment search happens on phones?

Most of the clicks. Phones produced 63 percent of clicks and 53 percent of impressions, and phone searchers clicked through at 5.2 percent against 3.4 percent on desktop. Desktop impressions also sat lower on the page, at an average position of 18.1 against 7.9 on phones.

DeviceShare of clicksShare of impressionsCTRAverage position

Mobile

62.8%

52.7%

5.2%

7.9

Desktop

36.3%

46.7%

3.4%

18.1

Tablet

0.9%

0.6%

6.4%

7.8

Do renters search in long questions yet?

Rarely, so far. Searches of eight words or more, about the length of a question typed to an AI assistant, were 0.5 percent of impressions and 0.1 percent of clicks. Three and four word searches did most of the work, with 72 percent of clicks.

Search lengthShare of clicksShare of impressionsCTRAverage position

1 to 2 words

21.0%

29.8%

2.4%

11.5

3 to 4 words

71.7%

60.0%

4.0%

11.3

5 to 7 words

7.3%

9.6%

2.5%

19.6

8 words or more

0.1%

0.5%

0.5%

15.1

The long searches that did appear read like prompts: which neighborhoods suit a renter, which communities answer maintenance requests quickly. They are a small share today. They are also the questions an answer engine picks a source for, so a page that answers them plainly is worth having before the share grows.

How do you compare your own community against this?

Pull the same numbers from your own Search Console, over the same 90 days, and read them against each other rather than one at a time.

  1. Set the window

    In Search Console, open Performance, choose the last 3 months, and turn on clicks, impressions, average CTR and average position.

  2. Split out name searches

    Add a query filter for queries not containing your community's name, then again for your management company's name. What is left is your non-branded search.

  3. Compare the split

    Here, name searches were 88 percent of clicks. A much higher share means the site mostly catches people who already know it.

  4. Check your pages

    On the Pages tab, see whether floor plan and community pages earn impressions, or whether the home page carries everything.

  5. Check the device split

    On the Devices tab, compare your phone share of clicks with the 63 percent here, and test the pages that earn them on a phone.

Then read the pattern:

  • High CTR on a low impression count

    You are most likely measuring name demand: people who already knew the place. Worth having, and it isn't growth.

  • Lower CTR on impressions in the tens of thousands

    You rank past your own name, into searches where you are one of ten options. A harder position, with more upside in it.

  • Low impressions and low CTR

    The site probably does not rank reliably for its own name. Fix that before anything else.

  • Average position worse while clicks rose

    Check whether you now appear for more searches. New searches far down page two drag the average down while total clicks climb.

Why do apartment websites resist comparison?

The figures above are pooled, and pooling hides real differences between sites. Four of them break many comparisons, so weigh any benchmark against them, this one included.

  • Template sites against rebuilt ones

    A platform's template site keeps listings in one place. A rebuild can give every community and floor plan its own page. The two are different sites for search, even at the same unit count.

  • Unit count and market

    A 40-unit building in a small town and a 300-unit property in a large city are not a fair match, however neatly the numbers line up.

  • Page type

    A floor plan page and a contact page earn very different click-through rates, as the table above shows, so one average for a whole site hides what an operator wants to know.

  • Audience

    A management company's site speaks to owners, residents and job seekers as well as renters. A single community's site mostly speaks to renters.

An aerial view of a dense city at blue hour, its streets glowing with warm light

How should you cite this benchmark?

Use the line below and link to this page, so a reader can check the window and the method.

Kihan Marketing, Apartment Website Search Benchmark, October 2026, kihanmarketing.com/multifamily-marketing/multifamily-search-benchmark/

Citation for this page

Method and limits

  • Sample

    Four apartment websites Kihan Marketing works on: two single-community sites and two management company sites that give each community its own page. The community figures cover the 236 community pages on those two management company sites.

  • Source and window

    Google Search Console, Search Analytics, web search only, final data, for the 90 days from July 17 to October 14, 2026. The window ends two days before the data was pulled, so no partial day is counted.

  • Pooled

    Shares and rates are pooled across the four sites, so a larger site weighs more. Medians and quartiles describe community pages, not websites.

  • Branded searches

    A search counts as branded when it names the community, its management company or someone at the company, matched against each site's own name, its community page names and close misspellings. A misspelling the match misses counts as non-branded, so the branded share is a floor. Street addresses are their own group.

  • Reported searches

    Google withholds rare searches, so the search type and search length tables cover the 60 percent of clicks that came with a reported search. The pooled rates, pages and devices cover every click.

  • Left out

    Pages unrelated to renting, 0.5 percent of impressions, are excluded.

  • Anonymized

    No site, community, company or place is named, and no figure is one site's alone: the page publishes shares, pooled rates, medians and quartiles, with no totals, minimums, maximums or single-site values.

  • Rounding

    Shares and rates are rounded to one decimal place, and the medians and quartiles of clicks and impressions to whole numbers.

  • Refreshed

    Every quarter, with the same script and the same rules.

Want your own Search Console read against these figures? That is part of a marketing audit. For how search works across a portfolio and for a single building, see property management SEO, and for the leasing side, lease-up and search intent in the glossary.

Google reviews

What clients say

5.0Rated 5.0 on Google
See us on Google (opens in a new tab)

Nicholas

Google review

Kiran and his team are simply fantastic! I've worked with 16 different third party marketing teams and they are by far the best. They are incredibly smart, responsive and an overall pleasure to work with. Since working with them over the last 2 months my ask of them constantly changes and their ability to quickly adapt and figure out new ways to quickly add value is incredibly impressive. I can't recommend Kiran and his team enough and will continue to work with them for the foreseeable future!

Reika

Google review

Kihan Marketing is a fantastic team to work with, friendly, professional, and highly responsive. They are highly responsive and quick to take action, ensuring projects move forward efficiently. Despite working in a fast-paced environment, they remain professional, organized, and attentive to detail. Their dedication really show in the quality of their work, and they consistently deliver results while maintaining clear communication. Highly recommended!

Real estate agency, Sint Maarten

Google review

Kihan Marketing Organization is friendly, professional, and very responsive. Kiran and his team move quickly, communicate clearly, and deliver high-quality work in both website development and social media marketing. They stay organized, pay attention to detail, and make the whole process smooth and efficient. Highly recommended for anyone looking to grow your online presence!

Watcharaponne

Real estate agency, Thailand

I highly recommend Kihan Marketing. Kiran is an incredibly talented, skilled, and thoughtful web designer. What impressed us most was that he didn't simply build a website, he took the time to truly understand our business, our vision, and the local Koh Samui real estate market. Throughout the process, Kiran provided valuable advice and creative ideas that helped shape the brand and support the growth of our business. His attention to detail and understanding of what makes a business unique resulted in a website that feels truly personal to our brand. He created the beautiful website for [a real estate agency in Thailand]. It represents the elegance, professionalism, and identity of our business beautifully. Thank you, Kiran and Kihan Marketing, for bringing our vision to life. Highly recommended!

Listya

Google review

Working together felt very collaborative and aligned. Communication flowed easily, tasks were well-organized, and we shared the same attention to detail throughout the process. It genuinely felt like working as one team.

Business client

Google review

Kihan Marketing Organization has been great to work with. The team is professional, responsive, and focused on delivering real results. I'm very satisfied with their service and would highly recommend them.

vittoria

Google review

Very fast and professional. I love working with Kihan Marketing. Definitely recommended

Wei

Real estate agent, Sint Maarten

I can't recommend Kihan Marketing highly enough. Kiran and his team truly went above and beyond in helping me with both my social media and my website, and the results speak for themselves.

Shelley

Cryotherapy studio near Seattle

I recently worked with Kihan Marketing to design my new website, and I couldn't be more thrilled with the experience. From start to finish, they were incredibly responsive, communicative, and attentive to every detail.

A property management website on a phone, surrounded by the search terms owners and renters use
Start a conversation

Tell us what your site is doing now and what it needs to do.

The more of this you fill in, the more specific the first reply is. Three fields are enough to start.

Goes straight to info@kihanmarketing.com. No autoresponder, no sequence. Or call (425) 954-3452.